โ
View complete GPT-powered meeting notes
Skim through the meeting in minutes by GPT-powered summary, notes, action items and more.
federation
plugin testing
browser stack
lambda test
sprint planning
module federation
Overview
The Sprint Planning and Retrospective meeting for the Whitebox project focused on addressing critical issues with Browser Stack, where Avinash highlighted inconsistent test failures, leading to a proposal to explore Lambda Test as an alternative. The team discussed the challenges of plugin testing, with Avinash investigating various approaches and a decision made for him to commit partial code for Milos to review and create a proof of concept. As part of their sprint planning, the team reported progress on merged tasks and reassigned task 102 from Avinash to Milos, with efforts to implement local sandbox tests. Key action items were assigned to team members, including tasks for Lambda Test implementation and plugin testing strategies, emphasizing collaboration on code reviews to maintain momentum for the sprint.
Notes
๐ Browser Stack Issues (02:44 - 15:01)
๐ Plugin Testing Challenges (15:02 - 27:00)
๐ Sprint Review and Planning (27:01 - 33:27)
๐ Next Steps and Module Federation (33:27 - 37:43)
- Avinash reported significant reliability issues with Browser Stack testing
- Tests failing inconsistently without code changes (9 tests failing one run, 30 the next)
- Adding more retries makes the situation worse
- Proposal to switch to Lambda Test as an alternative solution
- Lambda Test requires tests to be written differently with browser objects created manually
- Xavier suggested testing one test with Lambda Test before converting everything
- Milos recommended ensuring any new solution will support local device testing in the future
- Avinash spent extensive time investigating plugin testing approaches
- Most examples expect remote applications to be independent, unlike Whitebox's setup
- Avinash built tests using Federation system but couldn't integrate them with the host test suite
- Shared link to webpack maintainers' example as potential approach
- Decision to have Avinash commit partial code for Milos to review
- Milos suggested running Express server or development server to serve test components
- Xavier recommended using actual development/production servers instead of creating new test servers
- Team agreed Milos would create a POC to determine the best approach
- Avinash completed merging tasks 133 to 195
- Milos completed his concurrent transition work for the Wizard component
- Both team members making progress on their book reading assignments
- Plan to replace Browser Stack with sandbox tests
- Task 102 reassigned from Avinash to Milos
- Avinash to create a task for Lambda Test testing to replace Browser Stack
- Xavier emphasized completing all assigned tasks this sprint
- Task 209 contained within task 207
- Milos to focus on testing issues as priority
- Milos may begin work on empty slot behavior if time permits
- Team confirmed Federation system is working stably
- Xavier offered to review WIP code and asked Milos to review as original author
- Team to ping each other when ready for reviews
Action items
Avinash Sah
Miloลก
Xavier Antoviaque
- Write a discovery task for Lambda Test implementation (12:09)
- Enable local sandbox tests as an alternative to Browser Stack (14:37)
- Commit plugin test code with clear documentation of what works/doesn't work (23:04)
- Update description of task 102 explaining current status (30:36)
- Create task for Lambda Test testing to replace Browser Stack task (31:27)
- Complete book reading assignment (29:07)
- Review Lambda Test discovery task description (12:09)
- Take over task 102 for plugin testing implementation (30:22)
- Create proof of concept for plugin testing using development server (27:01)
- Complete task 209 (34:02)
- Work on empty slot behavior if time permits (34:13)
- Review Avinash's updates for tasks 133-195 (27:48)
- Review WIP code (36:53)